Governments ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror: Killing Their Own Citizens to Blame on Others to Advance Political Agendas

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2010
Washington's Blog

Forget the claims and allegations that false flag terror - governments attacking people and then blaming others in order to create animosity towards those blamed - has been used throughout history.

This essay will solely discuss government admissions to the use of false flag terror.

For example:

• The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president

• Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)

• The well-respected former Indonesian president admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings

• The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security" (and see this)(Italy joined NATO in 1949, years before the bombings occurred)
  

• As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the followingABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings*

There are many other instances of false flag attacks used throughout history proven by the historical evidence. See this, this and this. The above are only some examples of governments admitting to using false flag terror.

You can't call it a conspiracy theory when the government itself admits it.

And this is not just ancient history:

• Jimmy Carter's former National Security Adviser - Zbigniew Brzezinski - told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation
  

• A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag

* Note: While the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed for Operation Northwoods to be carried out, cooler heads prevailed; President Kennedy or his Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara apparently vetoed the plan.

WTF!? 'An attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada'

It’s not just their firm control of the planet’s media (98%)—as the few in the know have been screaming from the minarets, ALL Western governments have been thoroughly infiltrated by these people...

'An attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada'

Steven Chase
The Globe and Mail


“Prime Minister Harper has made it quite clear for some time now and has regularly stated that an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada... In this ongoing battle, Canada stands side-by-side with the State of Israel, our friend and ally in the democratic family of nations...We have stood with Israel even when it has not been popular to do so, and we will continue to stand with Israel, just as I have always said we would.”


Junior Foreign Affairs minister Peter Kent is suggesting Canada stands ready to throw its full military weight behind Israel, telling a Toronto publication that “an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada.”

His office says Mr. Kent, the minister of state for Foreign Affairs of the Americas, was merely “paraphrasing” what Stephen Harper has said in the past regarding Israel.

“It’s not too far from what the [Prime Minister] has said,” Norm McIntosh, Mr. Kent’s chief of staff, told The Globe.

But the junior minister’s statement would appear to be evidence that the Harper government is shifting to an ever more solidly pro-Israel stance.

Mr. McIntosh declined to confirm whether this means that Canada would automatically declare war on an aggressor that attacked Israel.

In an interview published in Shalom Life, dated Feb. 12, Mr. Kent said: “Prime Minister Harper has made it quite clear for some time now and has regularly stated that an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada.”

Mr. McIntosh pointed to Mr. Harper’s statements from May, 2008, marking the 60th anniversary of Israel, where the Prime Minister said: “Our government believes that those who threaten Israel also threaten Canada, because, as the last world war showed, hate-fuelled bigotry against some is ultimately a threat to us all, and must be resisted wherever it may lurk.”

“In this ongoing battle, Canada stands side-by-side with the State of Israel, our friend and ally in the democratic family of nations,” Mr. Harper said. “We have stood with Israel even when it has not been popular to do so, and we will continue to stand with Israel, just as I have always said we would.”

Feedback from a member of this group, an American domiciled in Morocco, re “An attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada”...


2/17/2010 14.43 PM GMT

Today, we can squarely put the feelings toward the Middle East by the Western Nations on the events of 9/11 which polarized the Western Society against the Arab Muslim world - living now in a Muslim country I can see this on a day-to-day basis - SAD, they we have been so guided by our past Western Leaders in this direction, an infamous staged event to accomplish this condition, in order to incease the financial gains of a few demigods - at present there is a live conference on Al Jazaeer with our Secretary of State and a few hundred citizens from the Middle East - and let me say, the response from the audience is not very good.

She is a good dancer, and as the audience demonstrates they are tired of the USA dancing and not doing anything constructive -- they are asking about Israel being the ONLY nuclear capability, and right now she is fast-stepping and evading any direct answer, she speaks of her direct experience talking to MIddle East leaders and her answer has gone over to the threat from IRAN ....in other words no answer...SAD our tune has not changed, leave Israel out of the Middle East picture, lets talk about the rest of NON DEMOCRATIC countries....the audience is rolling their eyes.... now she is even bringing al-Qaeda into the talk .... she says we have moved past the Cold War status, we are now in a difficult situation whereas we have people willing to kill themselve to cause havoc across the world....the narrator has now asked her about doing something about the imbalance that Israel represents with their nuclear capabilities - and she danced once again around the answer....and now she is responding that any country that wants nuclear capability, must look at the expense of doing so, and she is worried about living in a country where her next door neighbor (such as Iran) had the weapons and she did not..the conference is not going well.