Saturday, October 30, 2010

Jon Stewart's Executive Producer Arrested for Assaulting 9/11 Activist

By Matt Meyer

We Are Change NY
October 28, 2010

It has been remarked that “all the world loves a clown”. Thinking back to Stephen King’s Pennywise or John Wayne Gacy’s Pogo that might be debatable, but it is probably at least true that most people enjoy some form of well crafted humor or good satire. With that in mind many people may scratch their heads wondering why comedic talk show host Jon Stewart would be the recipient of serious questions regarding his stance on the events of September 11, 2001. 


Those same people may also scratch their heads wondering how, or even become angry at the suggestion that Jon Stewart’s Daily Show is simply another layer of misinformation laid out by the corporatocracy to be mindlessly absorbed by the zombified “moderate liberal” segment of the well-trained population. The theses submitted for your approval here are that 1.) Jon Stewart is a well entrenched member of the establishment’s mainstream media propaganda machine. 2.) The people putting on the “Rally to Restore Sanity” are the complete antithesis of what they claim to be – peaceful moderates who would rather talk things out and listen to the ideas of others. And, 3.) the Daily Show actually employs angry, sometimes violent, anti-American radicals and globalists who peddle the REAL conspiracy theories concerning U.S. domestic and foreign policy, geopolitics and science. Their conspiracy theories are then given a humorous spin and represented by funny pictures or captions on The Daily Show. These “funny” graphics are then placed next to Jon Stewart’s face so he can proceed to mug, smirk and feign outrage, ultimately resulting in applause and laughter from his obedient audience. But in the end it’s not real news, it’s not fake news, it’s propaganda peppered with jokes.


One month ago I was punched in the face by the executive producer of the Daily Show. I also had my camera damaged by another Daily Show writer, and had my shirt torn by Jon Stewart’s security guard. Jon Stewart and the writers and staff of the Daily Show were appearing at a popular book store in Manhattan to present and sign copies of their new book of humorous pictures and captions. I was moved to peacefully confront Jon and ask him a few questions after watching his show a few nights earlier.


On the September 16th installment of The Daily Show, before a gushing and edge-free interview with notorious criminal Bill Clinton, Jon announced his “Rally to Restore Sanity”. He billed this as a rally for which people should “use indoor voices” and “take it down a notch for America”. It was clear that this “Rally to Restore Sanity” was, in part, to be a mockery of the now co-opted and neo-conned Tea Party movement and its successful rallies featuring Glenn “the Judas Goat” Beck and the Palin the Pied Piper of soccer moms. It was also designed to poke fun at the more vocal elements of the anti-war movement. Essentially, the Daily Show had cooked up a rally for wishy-washy people who believed that other people were “insane” for being enraged by a corrupt and out-of-control government that increasingly ignores We the People, while bowing to Wall Street bankers, corporate interests and the military-industrial complex. Jon’s rally was to be for those who think injustice, theft and mass murder should just be laughed off (and that sarcasm is what should pass for humor). 


Getting upset and then vocalizing it using the first amendment, apparently, were the actions of lunatics. Once again a mainstream media talking head was reminding us that the first amendment should really be used to express popular and benign ideas, not controversial ones. These stand-down orders disturbed me, especially in the wake of a watered-down liberty movement, but the “joke” that encouraged me to take action was Jon’s mock protest sign suggesting that “9/11 was an OUTSIDE job”. He was not, by the way, suggesting Israeli Mossad or British MI6 involvement. He was goofing on the many concerned, often credible individuals who reject the ridiculous and impossible “official story” of 9/11. Again, it was “insane” to question 9/11’s official fable about cavemen with box cutters defeating a multibillion dollar defense, defying the laws of physics in the process. 


Yes, the hundreds of well-known military, intelligence service, and government officials, the engineers and architects, the pilots and professors, the members of media, artists and entertainers, the family members and survivors who rejected this nonsense – were all insane according to him. This was quite a dismissive and insulting statement by the diminutive comedian, but to his credit he did not launch into a clich├ęd “tin foil hat” reference. Still, I decided that I would question Jon when the opportunity came about.


The Incident
In the past I have peacefully confronted a number of well-known politicians and members of the mainstream media on both sides of the false left-right political spectrum about 9/11(Michael Moore, Sean Hannity, Nancy Pelosi, John McCain, Jimmy Carter, etc..). I’ve been shoved by cops and security, but never punched in the face before. On the evening of September 27th, 2010, I left work and headed alone to the Manhattan book store where Jon and the Daily Show writers were signing their new book. I happened to run into Luke Rudkowski and some other fellow members of We Are Change NYC in the bookstore, also hoping to question Jon. When I got the opportunity I asked Jon a polite, albeit unpopular question about his take on 9/11 truth. He and the crowd mocked me and I left, heading down the escalator and outside the store. Some We Are Change NYC acquaintances and I were outside the store, hoping to ask Jon Stewart a follow up question. Instead, The Daily Show staff and writers came out before Jon.


The executive producer of the Daily Show, Rory Albanese, was belligerent and taunted us. He immediately used a common tactic of those who want to defeat the 9/11 truth argument without actually using facts – he used emotional appeal, telling us that we were disrespecting the victims’ families. Like many who use this ad hominem approach he ignored the fact that 9/11 victims’ families started the 9/11 truth movement. It is important to note that Albanese put his hands on me twice by this point, lightly shoving my body as well as my hand holding a camera. He stated that he would put his hands on me if he so chose. He was also looking to fight with others, and mentioned that he wanted to punch a We Are Change member’s face because of his “knowledge”. Soon after, another writer for the show, named J.R. Havlan, was engaged in a heated exchange with another We Are Change member, Matt Lepacek. I was videotaping with my handheld camera as Havlan suddenly reached past two people to grab it – and proceeded to press and twist the viewfinder. He succeeded in damaging the camera, so I repeatedly asked him why he did it and suggested that he might have to pay for the damaged property. He walked briskly away.

Believing that the camera was irreparably broken, I put it in my pocket. Luke and the others with cameras had not made their way down the block just yet. I was walking along with Havlan and a few other writers as we all made our way down the sidewalk. There was some general body bumping made towards me by some of the staff and writers, telling me to “just walk away” (although admittedly, they were not as physically imposing as the bad guys from The Road Warrior). Once again, the aforementioned Rory Albanese was before me, blocking my path as Havlan crossed the street. I did nudge him out of my personal space without much force, as I reached into my pocket to once again inspect my camera and see if I could use it. Without warning Albanese landed a right handed, closed fist to the side of my face, which I did not see coming. By all definitions it was a “sucker punch”. I was stunned momentarily and when I came to, he had moved down the block, about twenty feet away. I did react defensively at first and did suggest that I was going to hit him back, but Jon Stewart’s security guard “Brian” grabbed me in a bear hug from behind. I threw him off and he grabbed me again, ripping my shirt in the front. Two other men stood between me and Albanese telling me to “just walk away”. At this point Luke arrived, helped calm me down and urged me to not hit Albanese, which I agreed to. (I was reminded of the arrest and false charges put on We Are Change’s Gary Talis, who was eventually cleared of the charge of assaulting a woman in a wheel chair, as well as the false terrorist charges placed against We Are Change L.A.’s Bruno Bruhwiler.) As I saw Albanese making his way around the corner I told an acquaintance to call the cops to report the assault, which was done.

My face was bruised and cut and I had a scratch on my nose. Albanese, I was told, made his way to a local bar. A while later he returned, right before the cops arrived. We both approached the police – reporting different stories. His consisted of me pushing him with two hands for no reason, when the reality was that he had already put his hands on me, had been harassing me, was blocking my path so his fellow Daily Show writer could leave, invaded my personal space, and then sucker punched me before taking off. Albanese was put in handcuffs and brought to the 14th street precinct. I was brought separately, where I gave my statement and a photo of my wounds was taken. Although I was told I would hear from the D.A. I never did.

One month later my cuts and bruises have healed, and I have realized it would be fruitless and a waste of time and money to pursue the matter. The important fact was that this incident was documented, and the NYPD (whose general attitude toward We Are Change is completely different than it was five years ago) helped make that happen. This is about a much larger point. The people holding the “Rally to Restore Sanity” are not moderate, rational or sane. Allow me to present that case.

The Reality About the People Who Want to “Restore Sanity” Since 1999, Political satirist Jon Stewart has hosted The Daily Show on Comedy Central, owned by Viacom – the fourth largest media conglomerate in the U.S. Jon has gained considerable attention and respect for his ability to “deliver truth through humor”. Many articles have been written about how his Daily Show delivers and assesses the news more accurately than the networks and cable. In recent times Jon was credited by the Huffington Post, NPR and other left-leaning outlets for his “hard hitting” interview with Mad Money’s Jim Cramer. Now to be sure, Cramer is a suspect individual who is alleged to have used his show to “pump and dump” stocks (not mentioned by Jon). However, while Stewart took on Cramer for putting entertainment before journalism, did we ever hear Jon mention the Chief Operating Officer of the NYSE who presided over the infamous “flash crash” of May, 2010 – who just happened to be his brother, Larry Leibowitz? (Jon changed his last name.) Certainly not. On the day of that “flash crash” Jon had some pretty good zingers about “fat fingers”, but alas an opportunity for some real insight from a real insider – his brother – was passed over. Larry Leibowitz is a former international investment banker who has served on a number of market and industrial committees, and again – is the current COO of the NYSE.

It is openly admitted that chicken hawk neoconservatives like William Kristol love doing The Daily Show, where Stewart might make them mildly uncomfortable for a minute, before jumping past the really hard hitting questions and shaking their hands with a smile. In the spirit of his “moderate liberalism” he has given a pass on real issues and war crimes to the likes of Doug Feith, John Bolton and Condoleeza Rice among others. How could a “sane” person joke around with the architects of an illegal, unjustified war that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of innocent people being dead? If neocons love doing his show, one can only imagine how the eugenics loving globalists who pose as concerned liberals on his show feel about it (Clinton, Gates, Gore, etc.). 


For proof of a globalist connection to the Daily Show, one need go no further than one of the show’s Emmy Award winning writers, Kevin Bleyer, who is a member of the globalist round table group known as the Council on Foreign Relations, whose stated mission can only be described as the erosion of U.S. sovereignty. His Wikipedia entry proudly boasted about his CFR membership until recently, but it can still be confirmed elsewhere, like on the CFR’s own website and Bleyer’s Facebook page in which two of his five “likes” are the CFR and Foreign Affairs, the CFR’s publication. In addition, Bleyer (who was one of the writers present on the night I was assaulted) is a Truman National Security Fellow, an organization that “recruits, trains, and positions progressives across America to lead on national security”. It appears that Bleyer is positioned nicely. One of the Truman National Security Project’s objectives is Operation Free, a particular project that “organizes military veterans to speak out on issues of climate change and sustainable energy security”. One can assume that Bleyer will not be writing any comedic exposes of “Climate Gate” anytime soon. He may, though, continue to write jokes for Barack Obama as he has done in the past – another instance that makes one consider possible conflicts of interest for The Daily Show and its true range of political satire.


Certainly, there is nothing wrong with the peaceful assembly of individuals to support any cause. However, as individuals it is important to closely inspect those who are “rallying the troops”, whether it’s Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin or even Jon Stewart. The establishment loves to make reference to Hitler and the Nazis, but it may be appropriate here to point out that the people standing and saluting at Nazi rallies actually adored Hitler – and by no means were they all evil people. They were just misled. I believe the people attending the “Rally to Restore Sanity” are being misled – once again. What is being advertised as a gathering of moderate and sensible people to laugh away the implosion of the Constitution and the dollar, has actually been designed to dull the senses so as to repress the most sane reactions to looking at the state of our Union, which should be anger, frustration and a steadfast resolve to fight.

In April of 2009 Jon Stewart was completely honest, before retreating back behind the flashing, pixilated curtain he helps hold in place. In an interview with CFR and Project for a New American Century member Clifford May, Jon rebutted the neocon’s defense of George W. Bush by stating that Harry S Truman was in fact a war criminal for his part in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Considering the thousands of innocent Japanese civilians who were vaporized or radiated to death, it is difficult for any “sane” person to argue that Truman was anything less than a mass murderer, let alone a war criminal. Yet only a couple of days later in a cringe-worthy display, Jon pathetically apologized for calling Harry a war criminal, explaining that it was a “dumb” and “stupid” thing to say. Even Robert McNamara admits that the only thing that saved Harry and his crew from not being labeled “war criminals” was that they won the war. Never the less, maybe Jon really had a change of heart, or maybe he didn’t want to insult his writer Kevin Bleyer, the Truman National Security Fellow. I guess only an insane conspiracy theorist would ponder such things.

Source: http://www.wearechange.org/?p=4330

23 comments:

  1. Stewart is a text-book example of a media gatekeeper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The parameters of what is acceptable for public debate in the former-USA continue to narrow and shrink. As further example of the bogus "free" election system, a Green Party candidate in California was recently arrested for trespassing when she showed up to watch a debate between the officially sanctioned Democratic and Republican stooges.

    http://www.marinij.com/sanrafael/ci_16328485

    ReplyDelete
  3. it seems very clear that Stewart is a puppet - I loathe him and pretty much everyone on the Idiot-Box!

    ReplyDelete
  4. On the old Rocky & Bullwinkle cartoon show, one episode of Fractured Fairytales has Aesop's son replying to his father. Dad says time heals all wounds. Son responds that, rather, time wounds all heels. So let it be with Jon Stewart et. al., eh?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Chinese have it right. In their written language, the character for "gate-keeper" is also the character for "F*ck" - as in "We're f*cked".

    Much of the anger is no doubt due to having to defend an indefensible position. They know they're on the wrong side of history.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jon Stewart IS A ZIONIST PR*CK,

    ReplyDelete
  7. Stewart is just like Colbert and just like Mahr, they are not dumb enough to believe what they spout, so they are obviously involved in a cover-up of sorts

    ReplyDelete
  8. I hope everyone remembers these punks when the truth bomb finally hits, cuz I dont want them saying "well, thats what I felt then, but I have changed my mind now" Because they are more than obviously trying to steer our nation into blindly obeying the propaganda

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jon Stewart is a puppet and a shill meant to pacify the liberal crowd. Same old phony Left vs. Right paradigm that helps NO ONE but the Rich Elitist Top 2%, get the peons fighting amongst each other, while the rich get richer as always.

    Worst thing about Jon Stewart is how obviously smug and proud of himself he is----always says, "We're just a comedy show!" but then he acts like Mr. Wisdom regarding every political topic. I agree with him a lot of the time, but then he'll turn around and cover for Obama, cover for Israel, cover for whatever, as long as he gets to stay rich, smug, and on TV.

    ReplyDelete
  10. As you point out, these guy's job is to keep the eaters in the box. So long as they are jumping up and down making monkey noises about which "party" is "right" they won't look too hard at reality. In truth, Jon Steward's (Leibowitz') message is, "shut up, relax and enjoy it. 'If it hurts get a better grade of lube". Their audiences are a mixture of those too scared to look at reality and those who are willfully ignorant. Here's a newsflash: They don't let people who threaten their scam on TV! Just like they don't run politicians who threaten the scam either. It's all a stage play. As you found out, those who pose a threat get punched (or much worse), sometimes they get "depressed". They've got the Jon Stewards and the Huffington Post monitors to keep the "liberal" side of the approved Chinese menu in line and the Glenn Beck's and Hannity's manipulating the "right". There IS no "left" or "right", just eaters in a Zionist-controlled fascist international state. All these cons are simply highly paid PR hucksters for the "Controllers".

    ReplyDelete
  11. Interesting. All those cameras and not one of them managed to film the punch or the arrest? No mention in any of the media, not even Fox News (who loathe Stewart) of the arrest.

    In the video we can clearly hear someone saying they wanted the Daily Show people to touch them so they could file assault complaints, which is why they get in the face of these people on the public street after being laughed out of the actual event.

    I have no doubt this is a total fraud. The guy faked the "punch" and even lied about the arrest. You see the guy talking to a cop., then a cut, then a cop car driving away. After all they said and did, no one bothered to film the actual arrest?.

    Bollocks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. At the end of the day, Stewart's allegiances align with Israel. I used to enjoy him. I can't anymore because his unabashed sock-puppetry have now crossed into covering up the deaths of 3,000 New Yorkers.

    The more I actually learn about "Jews", the clearer it is that their 2,000 years of being asked to leave every country they've resided in, has not largely been ignorance of the "goy", but rather a repeating realization of their modus operandi. It's neither coincidence, nor has it ended. Unfortunately, this tiny minority of global criminals have now amassed so much power politically and militarily, any awakening by the American people will be far too late.

    ReplyDelete
  13. you went looking for trouble and found it.it is a shame he did not stomp you for being an obvious a-hole.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Look: Stewart is a Jew. He is a hesitant Zionist--but foremost he serves his tribal masters. Not to say that all Jews are bad--but the ones who are successful in the game of shaping popular opinion are one and the same. So far as I can tell, the only sane Jew is Norman Finklestein.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You never say exactly WHAT your position on the "9/11 question" is. I have the sneaky suspicion you're one of those 'inside job' morons.
    Wherever you stand, please find a more constructive way to air your convictions - and stop whining about your unfair mistreatment! What did you expect?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wow. Ignorance abounds I see. Don't believe an executive would assault you for no reason? And, for that matter, you don't believe that all the people around holding cameras (most or all with cameras being employed by the guy) wouldn't film it? Of course they would, after all they're fair and honest journalists who just want the truth. Right? Right?
    Okay, enough of the delusion. This guy asked a question and got punched in the face, and you're defending the one who assaulted him. As a public figure, you are going to get asked questions, and the notion that these people are actually beyond question is downright disgusting and fascist. Are you der fuhrer? Are you chairman Mao? No? Then answer the question! Punch a man in the face and you only prove you don't have a REAL answer. I never bothered to watch any of these political shows, because unlike everyone else I don't recall the flip-flop every last show made when the left-right paradigm was again reversed. How about a campaign to restore freedom, mr. stewart? Seems to me your campaign is heavy on insanity and very light on individual freedom.
    I like the ad hominem attack by the shill at the end. Don't let a lack of knowledge get you done, so help you god you'll rail on the interwebs for a cause you don't understand! Good job jim bob! I mean, it's just amazing. You don't call him unscientific, or illogical, or lacking in facts. No, he's just an "inside job moron." Wow, shows real maturity to insult someone on an internet post, and to do so without any real information or facts just shows that those pesky facts have no effect on your zealotry. Your mother must be proud to have raised you so well. And, of course, you have certainly bested him in discourse, because the first rule of debate is "Whoever points fingers and screams the loudest always wins." It's obvious you're here to attack the messenger, as I see nothing in your post regarding any real argument whatsoever. To this I say, excellent work, you have certainly proven to any thinking person in the room that the other side is bankrupt on facts. After all, if there isn't any real evidence on 9/11, why is there such a movement to quell discussion? And why do random posters like you who, obviously lacking in decorum, feel the need to deride people you've never met regarding an issue you don't seem to have any real interest in?
    Regardless of what you think, it would seem there is real weight to the accusations, or the executive would have been sent home to be "questioned at a future date," not arrested on the spot. Obviously they seem to think there's something to all the injuries.
    I'm noticing a shrillness and anger to shills' posts lately, an increasing hostility that has been reaching a crescendo. It seems they're becoming increasingly angry that they have become irrelevant, that the propaganda machine has broken, and that nobody listens to them anymore. But feel free to keep screaming as loud as you can, wouldn't want any of those who newly realize the deception to be lulled back into a false sense of security by the vacuum of your angry, violent counterpoints. They just might forgot how terrible and insensible you guys were, and we can't have that, can we?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wow. Ignorance abounds I see. Don't believe an executive would assault you for no reason? And, for that matter, you don't believe that all the people around holding cameras (most or all with cameras being employed by the guy) wouldn't film it? Of course they would, after all they're fair and honest journalists who just want the truth. Right? Right?
    Okay, enough of the delusion. This guy asked a question and got punched in the face, and you're defending the one who assaulted him. As a public figure, you are going to get asked questions, and the notion that these people are actually beyond question is downright disgusting and fascist. Are you der fuhrer? Are you chairman Mao? No? Then answer the question! Punch a man in the face and you only prove you don't have a REAL answer. I never bothered to watch any of these political shows, because unlike everyone else I don't recall the flip-flop every last show made when the left-right paradigm was again reversed. How about a campaign to restore freedom, mr. stewart? Seems to me your campaign is heavy on insanity and very light on individual freedom.
    I like the ad hominem attack by the shill at the end. Don't let a lack of knowledge get you done, so help you god you'll rail on the interwebs for a cause you don't understand! Good job jim bob! I mean, it's just amazing. You don't call him unscientific, or illogical, or lacking in facts. No, he's just an "inside job moron." Wow, shows real maturity to insult someone on an internet post, and to do so without any real information or facts just shows that those pesky facts have no effect on your zealotry. Your mother must be proud to have raised you so well. And, of course, you have certainly bested him in discourse, because the first rule of debate is "Whoever points fingers and screams the loudest always wins." It's obvious you're here to attack the messenger, as I see nothing in your post regarding any real argument whatsoever. To this I say, excellent work, you have certainly proven to any thinking person in the room that the other side is bankrupt on facts. After all, if there isn't any real evidence on 9/11, why is there such a movement to quell discussion? And why do random posters like you who, obviously lacking in decorum, feel the need to deride people you've never met regarding an issue you don't seem to have any real interest in?
    Regardless of what you think, it would seem there is real weight to the accusations, or the executive would have been sent home to be "questioned at a future date," not arrested on the spot. Obviously they seem to think there's something to all the injuries.
    I'm noticing a shrillness and anger to shills' posts lately, an increasing hostility that has been reaching a crescendo. It seems they're becoming increasingly angry that they have become irrelevant, that the propaganda machine has broken, and that nobody listens to them anymore. But feel free to keep screaming as loud as you can, wouldn't want any of those who newly realize the deception to be lulled back into a false sense of security by the vacuum of your angry, violent counterpoints. They just might forgot how terrible and insensible you guys were, and we can't have that, can we?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wow. Ignorance abounds I see. Don't believe an executive would assault you for no reason? And, for that matter, you don't believe that all the people around holding cameras (most or all with cameras being employed by the guy) wouldn't film it? Of course they would, after all they're fair and honest journalists who just want the truth. Right? Right?
    Okay, enough of the delusion. This guy asked a question and got punched in the face, and you're defending the one who assaulted him. As a public figure, you are going to get asked questions, and the notion that these people are actually beyond question is downright disgusting and fascist. Are you der fuhrer? Are you chairman Mao? No? Then answer the question! Punch a man in the face and you only prove you don't have a REAL answer. I never bothered to watch any of these political shows, because unlike everyone else I don't recall the flip-flop every last show made when the left-right paradigm was again reversed. How about a campaign to restore freedom, mr. stewart? Seems to me your campaign is heavy on insanity and very light on individual freedom.
    I like the ad hominem attack by the shill at the end. Don't let a lack of knowledge get you done, so help you god you'll rail on the interwebs for a cause you don't understand! Good job jim bob! I mean, it's just amazing. You don't call him unscientific, or illogical, or lacking in facts. No, he's just an "inside job moron." Wow, shows real maturity to insult someone on an internet post, and to do so without any real information or facts just shows that those pesky facts have no effect on your zealotry. Your mother must be proud to have raised you so well. And, of course, you have certainly bested him in discourse, because the first rule of debate is "Whoever points fingers and screams the loudest always wins." It's obvious you're here to attack the messenger, as I see nothing in your post regarding any real argument whatsoever. To this I say, excellent work, you have certainly proven to any thinking person in the room that the other side is bankrupt on facts. After all, if there isn't any real evidence on 9/11, why is there such a movement to quell discussion? And why do random posters like you who, obviously lacking in decorum, feel the need to deride people you've never met regarding an issue you don't seem to have any real interest in?

    ReplyDelete
  19. you yourself stated that you nudged the guy (so you say) out of your personal space. you then say you reached into your pocket for your camera. your lucky you didnt get shot. your mistake was going to your pocket after the nudge. try the same thing to a cop and see what happens. people involved in public events are obviously and for well reason trained to do what he did. you would be dumb not too you were the aggressor by your nudge and you got bested by someone with fast reflexes. get over it

    ReplyDelete
  20. To the poster above, fuck that, if someone gets in your personal space, that is an attempt at intimidation and a physical threat. It is too bad you were so out numbered, next time you should bring some more people and boot fuck those cowards!

    ReplyDelete
  21. like what you wrote, I believe you also like what I would recommend.someday,i find my favoraite shop,in this shop, you can find huge selection ofYour blog is so informative ? keep up the good work!!!!rolex jewellery

    ReplyDelete
  22. That's funny, the video you posted didn't show anyone from the Dailey Show punching you.

    ReplyDelete
  23. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .
    net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.
    But he's tryiong none the less. I've been using Movable-type on numerous websites for about
    a year and am nervous about switching to another platform.
    I have heard excellent things about blogengine.
    net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress content into
    it? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!


    my web blog: hemorrhoid treatment at home

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...