Thursday, December 31, 2009

Art Students in WTC Connected to Israeli Intelligence Service

Jonathan Elinoff
Truth Alliance
October 20, 2009

Here is the mp3 of the 2nd appearance on Kevin Barret’s show where I explained in detail the rest of the story of the art students.

Kevin Barret’s Show (MP3) - Jonathan Elinof on the Israeli Art Student Mossad Connection

WATCH: Video of “;B-Thing”; Art Book



TruthAlliance Archived Link

To hear the details of the WTC Art Student story, listen to the following post from when I was on the Kevin Barret Show for the 2nd appearance. Although it was made clear that the story was to be released on Kevin Barret’s show, many missed the broadcast. This article will contain the information for part 2 of a story I began to break a few weeks ago.

Many misconceptions were and still are spreading about what exactly the implications of the story I broke are. The truth is, there has to be some background for people to understand the full scope of the investigation.


911, The Israeli Connection - AmDocs Spy Scandal - 4 Part Series (Fox News 2001)

Verint Systems (used to be called Comverse Infosys before AmDocs scandal), Comverse Technologies FOX News - 911 The Israeli Connection - Spy Scandal - 4 Part Series (Dec. 2001) How Israeli Backdoor Technology Penetrated the U.K. Government's Telecom System and Compromised National Security ".........Another anonymous source – a former CIA operative – tells me that U.S. intelligence agents who have aired their concerns about Verint and Amdocs have found themselves attacked from all sides. “Once it’s learned that an individual is doing footwork on this [the Verint/Amdocs question], he or she is typically identified somehow as a troublemaker, an instigator, and is hammered mercilessly,” says the former CIA operative. “Typically, what happens is the individual finds him or herself in a scenario where their retirement is jeopardized – and worse. The fact that if you simply take a look at this question, all of a sudden you’re an Arabist or anti-Semitic – it’s pure baloney, because I will tell you first-hand that people whose heritage lies back in that country have heavily worked this matter. You can’t buy that kind of dedication.” The former CIA operative adds, “There is no defined policy, at this time, for how to deal with this [security issues involving Israel] – other than wall it off, contain it. It’s not cutting it. Not after 9/11. The funeral pyre that burned on for months at the bottom of the rubble told a lot of people they did not need to be ‘politically correct.’ The communications nexuses [i.e. Amdocs/Verint] didn’t occur yesterday; they started many years ago. And that’s a major embarrassment to organizations that would like to say they’re on top of things and not co-opted or compromised. As you start to work this, you soon learn that many people have either looked the other way or have been co-opted along the way. Some people, when they figure out what has occurred, are highly embarrassed to realize that they’ve been duped. Because many of them are bureaucrats, they don’t want to be made to look as stupid as they are. So they just go along with it. Sometimes, it’s just that simple.” http://www.counterpunch.org/ketcham09272008.html


The Original Art Student Connection to 9/11

In January, 2001, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Office of Security Programs (IS), began to receive reports of Israeli art students attempting to penetrate several DEA Field Offices in the continental United States. Additionally, there have been reports of Israeli art students visiting the homes of numerous DEA employees. These incidents have occurred since at least the beginning of 2000, and have continued to the present. The number of reported incidents increased in November/December 2000, and has continued to date.

These incidents have involved several other law enforcement and Department of Defense agencies, with contacts made at other agencies’ facilities and the residences of their employees. Geographically, these incidents are very widespread, ranging from California to Florida. The majority of the incidents have occurred in the southern half of the continental U.S. with the most activity reported in the state of Florida. Since April 2001, the number of reported incidents has declined, however, the geographic spread of the incidents has increased to Wisconsin, Oklahoma, and Los Angeles. The activities of these Israeli art students raised the suspicion of IS and other field offices when attempts were made to circumvent the access control systems at DEA offices, and when these individuals began to solicit their paintings at the homes of DEA employees. The nature of the individuals’ conduct, combined with intelligence information and historical information regarding past incidents involving Israeli Organized Crime, leads IS to believe the incidents may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity. It is believed by IS that these incidents should not be the basis for any immediate concern for the safety and security of DEA personnel, however, employees should continue to exercise due caution in safeguarding information relating to DEA investigations, or activities.

DEA Orlando developed the first drug nexus to this group. Telephone numbers obtained from an Israel Art Student encountered at the Orlando D.O. have been linked to several ongoing DEA MDMA (Ecstasy) investigations in Florida, California, Texas, and New York. The Orlando D.O. has opened an investigation that is being coordinated with DEA HQs.

In general, these individuals appear to be organized in teams of 8 to 10 people, with one person described as the “;Team Leader”;. They are usually encountered in pairs or individually carrying a makeshift art portfolio. Several times, they have, been seen or admitted to being dropped off in an area by the Team Leader, who returns later to pick them up. The females are usually described as very attractive, and all are generally in their early to mid-20s. Most admit to having served in the Israeli Military. This is not surprising given the mandatory military service require in Israel, however, a majority of those questioned have stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordinance units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot missile unit. That these people are now traveling in the U.S. selling art seems not to fit their background.

Their stories are remarkable only in their consistency. At first, they will state that they are art students, either from the University of Jerusalem, or the Bezalel Academy of Arts in Jerusalem. Other times they will purport to be promoting a new art studio in the area. When pressed for details as to the location of the art studio or why they are selling the paintings, they become evasive. Some claim to be the artist who painted the artwork, others claim they are promoting the work of others or of Israel. Information has been received which indicates the art is actually produced in China. When told that they cannot solicit on federal facilities, they will claim that the paintings are not for sale, but that they are soliciting interest in the paintings, either for an art studio or for a future art sale.

An incident report by DEA Tampa has revealed much information relating to these individuals. DEA Agents at the Tampa District Office questioned the Team Leader of a group of 9 individuals at length, The Team Leader stated he purchases the paintings for $8 to $10 dollars from an individual in the Hollywood/Ft. Lauderdale, Florida area. The paintings are then sold for $50 to $80 dollars. (Other offices have reported the paintings selling for $150-$200 dollars.) The individuals come to the U. S. on tourist visas, and finance their stay here by selling the paintings. The Hollywood, Florida area seems to be a central point for these individuals with several having addresses in this area.

There have been incidents where criminal and/or suspicious activity has been associated with these individuals. Two were arrested by FPS in Plantation, FL with counterfeit Social Security Cards. Baton Rouge, LA discovered a small amount (personal use amount) of marijuana in the residence of one group, and some of the individuals interviewed by DEA/Tampa admitted to smoking marijuana. Criminal records checks have revealed some arrest history on persons associated with these groups. Passport irregularities have been reported. A review of their passports shows travel to several other countries, to include Thailand, Laos, India, Kenya, Central and South America, Australia, Germany, Amsterdam, and Canada. One individual presented a Canadian citizenship card along with his Israeli passport. A report from EPA/Denver involved a female art student going to the house of an EPA Special Agent to sell art, and returning later to photograph the house. There is a report of one of these individuals being seen diagramming the layout of a federal facility. This information has not been directly reported to DEA, and has not been confirmed by first-hand observation. When encountered at residences, some of these individuals are persistent in trying to get inside the home. Some have asked to use the telephone when leaving. Some employees have reported that they came only to their house, while others have reported that the students approached the entire neighborhood.

The B-Thing Connection

The members of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council were invited to use the 91 and 92 floor in WTC Tower 1, as part of a residency program (World Views program) from 1997 to 2001. In this program, the Gelitin crew, according to the New York Times article and the insert in the book I obtained from Gelitin, there were 14 art students who specifically shared the 91st floor together that knew and/or where involved in “The B Thing.”

According to the photos, those in the helicopter, across the street, and in the tower on the morning of the stunt number to around 6, although 4 are listed as having been involved in the stunt. There was a photographer on the ground taking photos of the helicopter and there were 2 other females with the 3 pictured men in the tower performing the stunt, so that added with the helicopter makes a minimum of 6 involved. Then there was the dealer of the art group who allegedly watched from a hotel. The New York Times article states, “Their dealer, who witnesses say watched the event from a hotel suite, now claims it never happened.”

september 11   Art Students in WTC Connected to Israeli Intelligence Service

90th floor WTC 1 B-Thing Israeli art students ready to remove a window

Israeli Art Students B-Thing WTC

Members in their construction rigging and apparatus for the observation deck (crop)

september 11   Art Students in WTC Connected to Israeli Intelligence Service

Members in their construction rigging and aparatus for the observation deck (Full)

Israeli Art Students WTC B-Thing Mossad

Diagam of observation deck

Israeli Art Students B-Thing WTC Mossad

Boxes framing the observation deck area

Israeli Art Students WTC B-Thing Mossad

Ariel view from rented helicopter showing member of B-Thing on observation deck

The night before the B-Thing, Mr. Harris said, he rented a top-floor suite at the Millennium Hilton, across the street from the Gelatin studio, and invited people to what guests described as a night of decadence. Near dawn, he and several others took cameras and boarded a helicopter, communicating with Gelatin via cell phone.

”If you write about the balcony, maybe you can just not write about it too much,” Ari Janka said to the New York Times to say after the initial interview he did with them, the first of several calls that allegedly took place protesting the appearance of the article released by the New York Times, despite the fact that the artists had published the book.

Josh Harris, the Internet entrepreneur once known for holding extravagant art parties, explained that Leo Koenig, the 24-year-old art dealer who represents Gelatin, got him involved. Mr. Koenig now says the balcony stunt never happened and, at any rate, he didn’t see it. The book is meant to provoke questions about its veracity, he said.

At the suggestion that the project might have been faked, Mr. Harris seemed almost offended. He produced March 2000 credit card bills bearing charges of $2,167.44 from the Millennium Hilton and $1,625 from Helicopter Flight Service.



Moukhtar Kocache, the director of the studio program, insisted that the photos of the balcony were obviously faked. But digital manipulation experts disagreed. George Dash, the co-owner of Nucleus Imaging on East 30th Street, and a colleague, John Grasso, used magnifying loupes to examine a copy of ”The B-Thing.” Neither could detect inconsistencies. ”The angles are all too perfect,” Mr. Grasso said. ”It looks real to me. Absolutely. I’ve been doing this for 22 years.”

Let me make clear that this stunt specifically was performing a construction operation in the WTC that was illegal according to WTC Security and the New York Times Article which states that certain people would have needed to of been contacted to remove a window from a building in New York as to not violate building codes and such. No one was contacted to be there outside the members involved in the stunt itself. It was initially denied that the stunt even took place, according to the New York Times, “Cherrie Nanninga, the director of real estate for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which until recently ran the World Trade Center. Port Authority officials, shown a copy of ”The B-Thing” by a reporter, reacted with disbelief, then outrage. Although their own investigation turned up no evidence, Ms. Nanninga said, ‘we have no reason to believe it didn’t happen.’ Window removal is considered so dangerous that when it is done the streets below are cordoned off, she said. ”It was really a stupid and irrational act that in my view borders on the criminal,” she said, adding that the stunt had jeopardized the studio program, whose space is donated by the Trade Center.”

Well it was criminal, because according to the New York skyscraper codes, she was right. The street would of needed to have been cordoned off and permits issued for the removal of a window, which is why in the insert of the book released by the art students, “Everything top secret and illegal of course. In days of conspiratorial work… They kept very mum about it all, because if word had crept out about their coup they could have been fined very heavily for sabotaging a national treasure… Incidentally, as proof that they were there, there is now a piece of old chewing gum stuck to the outside of the building at a dizzy height,” writes Tex Rubinowitz, in “The B-Thing.”

The art book shown in the video above shows the photos and drawings available to the public, however, after contacting some individuals involved with the stunt and a source who now lives in San Francisco who worked at the WTC on 9/11, I have obtained some other documents that never made it to the book, including a WTC construction pass.

B-Thing Construction pass Israeli Art Student WTC

Willie Rodriguez, one of the janitors who worked at the WTC and helped save lives that day, was the last person pulled from the rubble and was even recognized by the president for his actions. Aside from experiencing basement and sub-level explosions on 9/11 before the 1st plane hit, he also stated that he did see the art students in the WTC in an email exchange I had with him.

So why is all this information about an innocent art stunt so important, aside from the fact that these individuals had WTC construction passes in 2000 before releasing their book in August of 2001? Because according to the DEA report on the investigation into a separate story of art students in the country penetrating military bases, government agencies and so fourth as a part of a spy ring, 2 names show up in the arrests of over 140 spies that sparked interest for me.

Hanan Serfaty was arrested by DEA agents in connection to the Israeli spy ring. What makes him stand out, is that he was listed as being an art student who was apart of the World Views program, which was in the World Trade Center on floors 90 and 91 in the Lower Manhatten Cultural Council. Although he is not listed by Gelitin as a member of “The B-Thing,” the listing of the identities of the other 14 students who were on floor 91 at the time was never released to the public, neither was the total list of those involved in the stunt which numbers at a minimum of 6.

It should be noted that 1 member of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council died on 9/11 while working in his studio on the 91st floor. His name appears on the list of those who were in the building when it came down.

Hanan was an “;art student”; who was a former Israeli military intelligence officer who rented two Hollywood apartments close to the mail drop and apartment of Mohammed Atta and four other hijackers. Serfaty was moving large amounts of cash: he carried bank slips showing more than $100,000 deposited from December 2000 through the first quarter of 2001; other bank slips showed withdrawals for about $80,000 during the same period. Serfaty’s apartments, serving as crash pads for at least two other “;art students”;, were located at 4220 Sheridan Street and 701 South 21st Avenue. Lead hijacker Mohammed Atta’s mail drop was at 3389 Sheridan Street–approximately 2,700 feet from Serfaty’s Sheridan Street apartment. Both Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, the suicide pilot on United Airlines Flight 175, which smashed into World Trade Center 2, lived in a rented apartment at 1818 Jackson Street, some 1,800 feet from Serfaty’s South 21st Avenue apartment.

In fact, an improbable series of coincidences emerges from a close reading of the 2001 DEA memo, the 9/11 Commission’s staff statements and final report, FBI and Justice Department watch lists, hijacker timelines compiled by major media and statements by local, state and federal law enforcement personnel. In at least six urban centers, suspected Israeli spies and 9/11 hijackers and/or al-Qaeda¬ connected suspects lived and operated near one another, in some cases less than half a mile apart, for various periods during 2001 in the run-up to the attacks. In addition to northern New Jersey and Hollywood, Florida, these centers included Arlington and Fredericksburg, Virginia; Atlanta; Oklahoma City; Los Angeles; and San Diego.

Israeli “;art students”; also lived close to terror suspects in and around Dallas, Texas. A 25-year-old “;art student”; named Michael Calmanovic, arrested and questioned by Texas-based DEA officers in April 2001, maintained a mail drop at 3575 North Beltline Road, less than a thousand feet from the 4045 North Beltline Road apartment of Ahmed Khalefa, an FBI terror suspect. Dallas and its environs, especially the town of Richardson, Texas, throbbed with “;art student”; activity. Richardson is notable as the home of the Holy Land Foundation, an Islamic charity designated as a terrorist funder by the European Union and U.S. government in December 2001. Sources in 2002 told The Forward, in a report unrelated to the question of the “;art students”;, that “;Israeli intelligence played a key role in helping the Bush administration to crack down on Islamic charities suspected of funneling money to terrorist groups, most notably the Richardson, Texas-based Holy Land Foundation, last December [2001]“;. It’s plausible that the intelligence prompting the shutdown of the Holy Land Foundation came from “;art student”; spies in the Richardson area.

Israeli agents operating at international airports

They’re already sniffing your phone conversations, your emails, your Web surfing habits...Now they’re checking you out in person at an airport near you. For those of you who may be unaware of this group, Shin Bet is Israel’s master intel agency — the most ruthless gang of ‘security’ operatives on the planet, staffed mainly by ex-Sayeret Matkal (Special Forces) commandos. Shin Bet is to Mossad what the NSA is to the CIA — only Shin Bet makes our NSA lads look like kindergartners in comparison. Shin Bet were the primary architects of 9/11; do your research...



Israeli agents operating at international airports


Big News Network.com
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=570743


“We pull the wool over everyone’s eyes. We do exactly what we want. The local authorities do not know what we are doing.”


Israeli spies have been found to be posing as airport security guards at international terminals, subjecting unsuspecting travellers to illegal interrogations and strip searches.

A television network covering southern Africa recently aired a report, after an extensive undercover investigation, that revealed an elaborate Israeli secret service operation is being carried out at Johannesburg International Airport.

Television footage shows an undercover reporter being interrogated by an El Al official at the airport in Johannesburg.

The report claims black and Muslim travellers are being subjected to illegal interrogations and strip searches by Israeli intelligence service, the Shin Bet, who are purportedly employed as security guards by Israeli airline El Al, but pose as officials of airport security.

The racial profiling is so extensive one former agent says he has conducted 40,000 of the interrogations. An Israeli human rights organization says similar operations are being carried out at most major airports around the world.

The South African government has been investigating the claims made by Carte Blanche, southern Africa’s leading television investigative news program which is beamed to 45 countries and has won more than one hundred awards. A team of Israeli diplomats has been flown to Johannesburg after South African authorities issued an ultimatum demanding that Israel resolve the issues surrounding the security guards by the end of this month, or the guards would all be deported.

At least one El Al official, has already been deported as a result of the investigations which are continuing. Curiously that official was in fact revealed to be an employee of the Israeli embassy, despite performing duties for El Al security. He was also found to have had a diplomatic passport.

The explosive claims made on the southern African television network have been supported by footage of an interrogation of an undercover Muslim reporter with the network. The incident was filmed by a hidden camera. A person employed by El Al was seen approaching the Muslim reporter saying he was from “airport security.” He demanded the undercover reporter hand over his ID and passport as part of “airport regulations.” The reporter objected to handing over documents, saying he was not travelling and was waiting for a friend. At this point “El Al’s Security Manager,” identified as Golan Rice, confronted the reporter for additional interrogation. The reporter was then told he was in a restricted area and was told to leave.

“What we are trained is to look for the immediate threat, the Muslim guy. You can think he is a suicide bomber, he is collecting information. The crazy thing is that we are profiling people racially, ethnically, and even on religious grounds,” Johnathon Garb, a former El Al security guard told the Johannesburg TV program. “This is what we do,” he added.

Mr. Garb said the El Al airline had been a front for Shin Bet for years. “Here is a secret service operating above the law in South Africa,” Garb said. “We pull the wool over everyones’ eyes. We do exactly what we want. The local authorities do not know what we are doing.”

Two other former security guards with El Al verified the allegations. They told Carte Blanche black and Muslim people were often taken to a special annex room where they were held for questioning. They were interrogated they said not necessarily on matters relating to airport security. In some cases they were strip searched and their luggage taken apart. Clandestine searches of their possessions and laptops were also carried out.

One person targeted for special treatment was Virginia Tilley, the chief researcher at South Africa’s Human Sciences Research Council which recently released a report accusing Israel of apartheid in the Palestinian territories. “The decision was she be checked in the harshest way because of her connections,” Garb told the Carte Blanche news program. He said Ms Tilley’s luggage was taken from her and documents in her possession were photo-copied and forwarded on to the Shin Bet in Israel. Ms Tilley confirmed she had been detained by El Al staff at the airport and her luggage was taken from her for inspection elsewhere.

El Al’s General Manager in South Africa confirmed Mr Garb was working in security at the airport but was indirect on who his employer was, suggesting it was the Shin Bet.

Three years ago a report issued by two Israeli human rights organizations, the Centre against Racism, and the Arab Association for Human Rights, alleged that El Al security staff employed racial profiling at most major airports around the world. The report said people were subjected to discriminatory and degrading treatment in violation of the relevant countries’ laws, and international law. “Our research showed that the checks conducted by El Al at foreign airports had all the hallmarks of Shin Bet interrogations,” Mohammed Zeidan, the Director of the Human Rights Association said.

Mr Garb, who said he was recruited by the Shin Bet 19 years ago and was trained in a secret Shin Bet facility in Israel, said El Al smuggled weapons into the Johannesburg Airport with the co-operation of the Israeli embassy.

Asked to comment on the allegations, the Israeli foreign ministry, through spokesman Yossi Levy said, "the Ministry cannot comment on security matters."





(Carte Blanche is an investigative programme on South Africa’s MNet TV)

On Sunday, 30 August, Carte Blanche exposed how the Israeli airlines El Al, was profiling and detaining innocent people.

This is the text of that episode:

This man is part of an undercover experiment on his way to meet a friend at the airport checkin. Filming from a distance is a white scuffy cameraman. They are about to test an allegation that security personell from El Al Airlines will target our man even if he is not one of their passengers, simply because he’s a muslim.

It didn’t take long before El Al approached him.

El Al representative: ‘Hi, how are you? Where are you flying to?’

Undercover man: ‘No, I’m not going anywhere. I’m waiting for a friend of mine.’

El Al representative: ‘Do you have your passport or ID with you here?’

El Al representative: ‘We’re security from the airport here. You’re not flying today?’

Undercover man: ‘You’re from airport security?’

El Al representative: ‘Yes.’

Airport security? No they are not says Jonathan Garb, a former El Al security employee.

Jonathan Garb (Former El Al security employee): ‘This here is a secret service operating above the law in South Africa. We pull the wool over everyones eyes. We do exactly as we please – the local authorities do not know what we are doing.’

Undercover man: ‘Is something wrong?’

El Al representative: ‘No, we just have to… its just the regulations of the airport.’

Jonathan: ‘To members of the public they will represent themselves as airport security – not even as El Al security. It will be a public area and they will tell them that they are not allowed to be standing in this area.’

This is Golan Rice. According to his business card he was the El Al security manager.

Jonathan: ‘But in fact we are working for Israeli Security Agency which is the internal security service of the government of Israel.’

So our undercover footage shows a South African citizen, standing in a public place in his country being grilled by an Israeli secret agent – in full view of other passengers.

Golan Rice (El Al Security Manager): ‘Hi. I’m the security manager of the company. Can I see your passport or ID?’

Undercover man [shows ID]: ‘I just showed your friend over here now.’

Undercover man: ‘What is this about?’

Golan: ‘What time is he supposed to come… your friend?’

Undercover man: ‘He said about half past eight he’ll be here.’

Golan: ‘What is your friend’s name?’

Undercover man: ‘Bradley.’

Undercover man: ‘Why are you asking me all of this?’

Golan: ‘What time he told you to come?’

Undercover man: ‘Half past eight.’

Undercover man: ‘What is this about though?’

Golan: ‘No, I just want to see why…’

Undercover man: ‘I’m just waiting for my friend.’

Golan: ‘You know this airport decided that only passengers that fly can enter this area.’

Jonathan: ‘You know what the joke is – the way that they are behaving here they can’t do it in Israel! They wouldn’t dare do it in Israel. They would be taken to the Israeli courts by employees and by the way they treat passengers.’

But at OR Tambo, El Al is unhindered.

Jonathan: ‘What we are trained is to look for the immediate threat – Muslim guy – you can think he is a suicide bomber, he is collecting information. The crazy thing is that we are profiling people racially, ethnically and even on religious grounds – which is … this is what we do.’

Bongani Bingwa (Carte Blanche presenter): ‘This year after 19 years with the airline Jonathan was summarily dismissed for leading a labour dispute. Furious at how he was treated he decided to expose his former bosses.’

Bongani: ‘Why are you talking to us?’

Jonathan: ‘I am absolutely disillusioned with this whole story, it is like taking me like a piece of paper, crumpling me up and throwing me away.’

Bongani: ‘But now that they are doing it to you, suddenly you have problems with it?’

Jonathan: ‘Ya, I admit it. I am not proud of what I have done.’

Jonathan’s case is in good hands, his lawyer Michael Bagraim is also the President of the Jewish Board of Deputies.

Michael Bagraim (Lawyer): ‘I think it is an excellent case. I think he has been unfairly dismissed. I don’t think they have a good reason for the dismissal, and I don’t think they followed the procedure in the dismissal at all. And not only don’t I think that, the paperwork proves exactly what I am saying.’

19 years ago El Al approached Jonathan to work for them.

Jonathan: ‘I arrived at the airport and they tell me,’You’re going to do armed security.’ Armed security is being undercover, carrying a handgun and at that time as well – sounds crazy – but we carried Samsonite briefcases with an uzzi submachine gun in it.’

In preparation, Jonathan went to Israel for secret training.

Jonathan: ‘It was exciting, I was young, we were dealing with weapons. We were trained at a secret camp where they train Israeli Special Forces. They train you how to use hand guns, submachine guns and in unarmed combat.

Bongani: ‘For eight years Jonathan did armed security for the airline. Then in 1994 everything changed and only Israelis were allowed to do this, so he became a profiler. His role to identify suspicious passengers and turn on the heat.’

Jonathan: ‘Did anyone else give you anything to take or deliver to Israel?’

Woman: ‘No.’

Jonathan: ‘You need to understand that it’s happened before on this airline where people have taken something, and what was in it was a bomb.’

Woman: ‘No, no.’

All El Al passengers are profiled and the profilers are trained to look for specific suspicious signs.

Jonathan: ‘To give you an idea September 11th – Israeli security would have stopped it on the ground. After September 11 we didn’t change our security procedure.
September 11… all had one way tickets, they were also not dressed appropriately and they sat in business class so they could run for the cockpit. It was quick and no one could react to them.’

El Al’s own history is marked by bloody attacks and foiled attempts.

1968 A hijacking en route from Rome – 21 hostages are freed after 40 days
1969 Zurich airport – a pilot is killed and a co-pilot injured
1970 El Al flight from Tel Aviv to New York is hijacked
1985 Deadly attacks at the airports in Rome and Vienna
1986 London – A terrorist attack is foiled
2002 Los Angeles International – six Israelis are killed

Bongani: ‘Isn’t there a case that this is how El Al should do these things?’

Jonathan: ‘El Al does excellent security work but they work above the law.’

Jonathan has profiled over 40 000 people, one of those was international expert on Middle East politics, Virginia Tilley.

Jonathan: ‘The decision was she should be checked in the harshest way because of her connections.’

Virginia Tilley (Comparative political scientist): ‘There are intelligence agents in the security area. They may call them airline security, but there’s no difference here. And you have to get through that barricade to get on the plane.’

Virginia was taken to an interrogation room where she was seperated from her luggage

Virginia: ‘And they set me in a room and they put my luggage on a table in another room with an open door. And then after about 5 minutes that door just closed and I couldn’t see my luggage any more. Now what were they doing with all that stuff for 45 minutes?’

Up until now she could only guess, but Jonathan confirmed what really happened that day.

Jonathan: ‘She had like a portfolio. Golan Rice took the folder while it was in the back room. She couldn’t see what we were doing and photocopied all the documentation and then he forwarded it on to Israel.’

Bongani: ‘Who was that information passed on to?’

Jonathan: ‘Well I would imagine that it would be passed on to the Israeli Security Services, it would be of no benefit to El Al the airline.’

Bongani: ‘So you’re saying it’s like the CIA doing what they want at OR Tambo?’

Jonathan: ‘It’s like the CIA or the FBI or MI5, but they are hiding behind the guise of the airline.’

Virginia Tilley is currently on a two year research assignment at the HSRC. The project brought South African, Palestinian and Israeli scholars together to debate their future. To avoid El Al’s treatment they came to South Africa on a different airline, but El Al phoned the travel agent, wanting to know who her visitors were meeting.

Virginia: ‘For El Al to be interrogating private South African citizens about the agenda of visitors to the Human Science Research Council is entirely inappropriate if not illegal!’

Bongani: ‘Given the difficulties of the Israeli’s situation, isn’t it reasonable that they take these kinds of precautions?’

Virginia: ‘Well there are two problems with that. First is the racial profiling – to judge people and treat them differently on the basis of race is inadmissable in South Africa today. Second the questions go far beyond the only legitimate interest at that point, which is the security of the airplane.’

So who are these people that Jonathan says employed him?

Jonathan: ‘In Hebrew it is known as the Shabak or Shin Bet – it’s the internal security service of the Israeli government. They have a reputation of being absolutley ruthless in the way that they have handled the situation in Israel.’

As proof Jonathan produced several documents and a letter from El Al’s general manager, Roz Bukris, in which she clearly states that the Israeli security agency is his employer, so we gave her a call.

Roz Bukris (El Al – General Manager): ‘Hello?’

Bongani: ‘Hello Roz., you are speaking to Bongani from Carte Blanche.’

Roz: ‘Hi Bongani, can I ask you to call me in about 10 minutes? I’m just busy on an overseas call.’

So we tried Roz as she asked, but from then on for three days she ducked and dived, avoiding our calls. Then an email came from El Al in Bedfordview saying that they do not give out any information on their security but we simply wanted to know who Jonathan Garb worked for.

Bongani: ‘We would like to do an on camera interview. Now your guy has explained to us…’

Golan: ‘No, I can’t.’

Security manager, Mr Golan Rice, was also shy. We would have asked him why his weapon is licenced to the Israeli embassy and why he passed on Virginia Tilley’s information to Israel, but no deal.

The Israeli embassy were equally reluctant to give us answers.

Man: ‘This is the Israeli embassy…’

Bongani: ‘That’s the Israeli embassy, this is public property…’

The ambassador Dov Segev Steinburg told our journalist that we should look for answers from El Al as the embassy had nothing to do with a private company.

Journalist: ‘Sorry. So, from your side you’re saying that the State of Israel is not involved with El Al at all?’

Dov Segev Steinburg (Israeli ambassador to South Africa): ‘Look, that is what I can tell you… El Al is a private company and with regard to your question you should refer it to them.’

But how then does the ambassador explain the weapons used by the new security manager Eli Shukrun and his predecessor Golan Rice. Carte Blanche has confirmed that their arms are licenced to the embassy. If El Al is a private company with nothing to do with them, why would the embassy be so generous as to loan them it’s weapons?

Bongani: ‘A recent El Al ad campaign features passengers flying on the airline as angels. In reality those with a certain look, your experience is likely to be one straight out of hell.’

Isaac Mgidi (Mgidi Agricultural Development): ‘I wasn’t angry but I was burning… it was a classical replica of the old South African apartheid style.’

Isaac was so incensed by his treatment at the hands of El Al that he has taken the matter to the South African embassy to Israel. He has a small NGO that assists woman’s groups to produce food. The Israeli’s are experts in hydroponics so he planned a knowledge sharing trip to Israel and arrived at the El Al check in, in June.

Isaac: ‘The question I asked is, ‘Why are you doing all these things, what is your problem?’ And then she said, ‘Well, we are protecting the State of Israel.’ And I said, ‘If you are protecting the State, against who?’ She said, ‘Against the Palestinians or whoever…’ I said, ‘But do we look like Palestinians?”

Jonathan explained that ‘black’ people receive a harsher profiling process than ‘white’ people.

Bongani: ‘In South Africa in 2009, that doesn’t seem right – surely?’

Jonathan: ‘Of course its not right, of course its not right.’

Isaac and his colleague were taken to this little room behind the check in, told to remove their shoes and their pants, and with their hands up, face the wall.

Isaac: ‘The first question I had in my mind was, ‘Where are the South African security people?’ And it became even worse. You have these people that are saying that they are protecting the State of Israel and whereas we are in the Republic of South Africa.’

Bongani: ‘Can you say no?’

Jonathan: ‘You can say no. What right have I got as Israeli security to tell someone to open their pants?’

So where does El Al get their authority? According to the law only an authorised person – that is the police, the SANDF or any other person appointed by the minister of transport can do this kind of search.

This is an extract from the depratment of transport’s letter to Carte Blanche:

‘… There is therefore no basis for appointing El Al or anyone within their security division as authorised person in terms of the Civil Aviation Offences Act. Our records do not show any attempt by the minister to appoint anyone within El Al as an authorised person under the auspices of the Civil Aviations Offences Act.’

Isaac and his colleague were forced to leave their laptops and shaving kits in Johannesburg. Even a pair of shoes became an issue.

Bongani: ‘So they never even got onto the plane.’

Isaac: ‘No, no, no, they never got on the plane.’

Isaac: ‘And these were a brand new pair of shoes!’

Xolile Nxu’s story is not without irony. He was invited to an international conference which looked at ways in which Palestinians could move away from violence to achieve democracy through peaceful demonstrations. Jonathan profiled him too.

Bongani: ‘Why him?’

Jonathan: ‘He is ‘black’, he was travelling to the Palestinian Authority for some meetings and we were told that we had to give him the harshest procedure and we had to search him.’

Once Jonathan had profiled him, Xolile was taken to the same small room, interrogated, searched and he too was stripped down to his pants.

Xolile Nxu (First Deputy President SAMWU): ‘Then this one said, ‘Take off your pants,’ and we started arguing. He never answered any questions. He kept on repeating, ‘Please take off your pants.”

Bongani: ‘Were they aggressive with you?’

Xolile: ‘At one stage they were, they were swearing at me.’

Bongani: ‘What were they saying?’

Xolile: ‘They were saying, ‘You are not going to f***ing go to this country – we will make sure that we follow you.”

Eventually after 2 hours Xolile was escorted onto the plane. He was left in no doubt as to who his interrogators were.

Xolile: ‘How do you allow intelligence of another country to operate in your country?’

Bongani: ‘How do you know they were Israeli intelligence services?’

Xolile: ‘The very people who asked me the questions escorted me to Tel Aviv – how can that be airport security?’

So are South African authorities aware of what El Al security is doing here. We were surprised at the muted response we received from them. Perhaps that is exactly what El Al security is counting on. In the meantime South African passengers remain at the mercy of Israeli agents in Johannesburg.

Jonathan: ‘I once had an innocent man, an elderly man wetting his pants from being continually battered and badgered in the security process. The passenger was my passenger but I was working according to procedure pushing and pushing and just trying to intimidate passengers.’

Bongani: ‘When that happens, what did you feel?’

Jonathan: ‘I was embarrased for the gentleman and I was embarrased for myself because nobody deserves to be treated like this and for something like this to happen.’

On Thursday Jonathan met with the investigators from the Private Security Industry regulatory authority. They have confirmed that El Al’s security people are not registered with them and have opened an investigation into EL AL security’s practices. Their investigation continues…

Suraya Dadoo

Researcher, Media Review Network

Johannesburg

Ph / Fax: (011) 852 7301

E-mail: suraya_dadoo@telkomsa.net

www.mediareviewnet.com

http://rain.org.za/carte-blanche-exposes-el-als-activities-at-johannesburgs-o-r-tambo-airport/

http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091123/FOREIGN/711229870/1140

InfraGuard: FBI Deputizes Corporations to Enforce Martial Law










BY GARY D. BARNETT/ROCK CREEK FREE PRESS

There is an organization that is quietly and secretly becoming very large and powerful. The FBI started this partnership or alliance between the federal government and the private sector in 1996 in Cleveland with a few select people. After September 11, 2001, when the general population replaced their rationality with fear, this organization, called InfraGard, continued growing, and with little notice. By 2005 more than 11,000 members were involved, but as of today, according to the InfraGard website, there are 23,682 members, including FBI personnel. At first glance, many would think this alliance healthy and useful in the fight against “terrorism,” but upon further examination, one has to wonder.





InfraGard began as an alliance between the FBI and local businesses with the objective of investigating cyber threats. Since that time, little resemblance to that design exists. According to InfraGard’s own website, InfraGard is an information sharing and analysis effort serving the interests and combining the knowledge base of a wide range of members. At its most basic level, InfraGard is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the private sector. InfraGard is an association of businesses, academic institutions, state and local law enforcement agencies, and participants dedicated to sharing information and intelligence [emphasis added] to prevent hostile acts against the United States.

Every InfraGard chapter has an FBI special agent coordinator attached to it, and this FBI coordinator works closely with FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. Initially, while under the direction of the National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC), the focus of InfraGard was cyberinfrastructure protection, but things have gotten much more interesting since September 11, 2001. NIPC then expanded its efforts to include physical as well as cyberthreats to critical infrastructures.

A progression is occurring, but it gets even more interesting as time passes. In March 2003, NIPC was transferred to the Department of Homeland Security which now has total responsibility for critical infrastructure protection (CIP) matters. Part of the Department of Homeland Security’s mission is to facilitate InfraGard’s continuing role in CIP activities and to further develop InfraGard’s ability to support the FBI’s investigative mission, especially as it pertains to counterterrorism and cyber crimes.

InfraGard’s stated goal “is to promote ongoing dialogue and timely communications between members and the FBI.” Pay attention to this next part:

“Infragard members gain access to information that enables them to protect their assets and in turn give information to government that facilitates its responsibilities to prevent and address terrorism and other crimes.”

I take from this statement that there is a distinct tradeoff, a tradeoff not available to the rest of us, whereby InfraGard members are privy to inside information from government to protect themselves and their assets; in return they give the government information it desires. This is done under the auspices of preventing terrorism and other crimes. Of course, as usual, “other crimes” is not defined, leaving us to guess just what information is being transferred. Since these members of InfraGard are people in positions of power in the “private” sector, people who have access to a massive amount of private information about the rest of us, just what information are they divulging to government? Remember, they are getting valuable consideration in the form of advance warnings and protection for their lives and assets from government. This does not an honest partnership make; quite the contrary.

In my article “The New Crime of Thinking,” I criticized H.R.1955 and Senate 1959, which, if passed, will literally criminalize thought against government. As usual, the exact type of thought is left undefined. This vagueness in the thought-crime legislation together with the secrecy of InfraGard makes for a dangerous combination. S.1959, if passed, will be attached to the Homeland Security Act and InfraGard is already a part of the Department of Homeland Security. This is not a coincidence. Under section 899b of S.1959 it is stated:

“Preventing the potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily accomplished solely through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and can benefit from the incorporation of State and local efforts.”

This appears to be a direct reference to the InfraGard program. Moreover, in section 899c of S.1959 the new commission, created after passage, is to build upon and bring together the work of other entities, and will establish, as designated under 899d, a “Center of Excellence.” This center will be university-based, and is to study “violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism” in the United States. According to InfraGard’s mission statement, it is a group of businesses, academic institutions, state and local law enforcement, and other participants dedicated to sharing information and intelligence. Keep in mind that this new center will be, and InfraGard already is, a part of the Department of Homeland Security. I’m just speculating, of course, but is it possible that InfraGard will be a domestic police and spying arm for the government concerning “thought crime”?

There is a definite and natural link here, and it should give us pause. The definitions concerning thought crime are vague and unclear, left to the interpretation of government only. InfraGard, on the other hand, is an organization cloaked in secrecy. It holds secret meetings with the FBI. It also, according to FBI Director Robert Mueller, shares information (what information, we don’t know) with the Secret Service and all government agencies involved with security in the United States.

One question on InfraGard’s application for membership is, Which critical infrastructures does your organization belong to? Some choices listed are defense, government, banking and finance, information and telecommunications, postal and shipping, transportation, public health, and energy. At least 350 of the Fortune 500 companies have representation in InfraGard, this according to their website. These representatives have access to most of our private records, including phone and Internet use, health records, and banking and finance records. Considering the recent attempts by President Bush and his administration to protect many telecommunications companies and executives from prosecution for releasing private information, how many of the top telecom executives are members of InfraGard? I, for one, would be very interested in this information, but alas, it is not public information; it is secret.

According to InfraGard’s own policies and procedures,

“The interests of InfraGard must be protected whenever presented to non-InfraGard members. Independent of the type of presentation, (interview, brief, or published documentation) the InfraGard leadership and the local FBI representative should be made aware of the upcoming presentation. The InfraGard member and the FBI representative should agree on the theme of the presentation. The identity of InfraGard members should be protected at all times.”

This means that no one outside InfraGard is to know who is a member unless previous approval has been given. In addition, when interviews with members of the press are forthcoming, all questions should be submitted in writing prior to the interview. The InfraGard leadership and the local FBI representative should review the submitted questions, agree on the character of the answers, and identify the appropriate person to be interviewed prior to the interview. Even demeanor is addressed in this directive, and strict guidelines for behavior are listed. You see, when I said secret, I wasn’t kidding.

The bottom line is this: This is an organization created by the FBI, sanctioning individuals from the private business sector to provide information, sensitive and private information, to government agencies for special concessions. These concessions, or favors, according to an article titled “The FBI Deputizes Business,” in The Progressive magazine, include advance warning on a secure portal about any threatening information related to infrastructure disruption or terrorism. InfraGard notes as much on their website by advertising for members “access to an FBI secure communication network complete with VPN encrypted website, webmail, listservs, message boards and much more.” Also advertised: “Learn time-sensitive, infrastructure related security information from government sources such as DHS [Department of Homeland Security] and the FBI.” Is this elitist group of InfraGard members a group of Americans superior to the rest of us? Are they truly privileged or just selling their souls for protection and favors? And how involved will they be in watchdog activities, activities sanctioned by the U.S. government? Is this a new kind of conscription by government meant to increase its surveillance capabilities so that it can monitor our lives even more than it does now?


Legislation, bureaucracies, and government/business partnerships created since 9/11 have severely infringed our freedom. Almost all of the so-called terror-protection legislation has been linked—and in many cases it is linked—to increased government oversight of the rest of us. This is evident concerning InfraGard and the Department of Homeland Security. If this program is for the benefit of this country, why are the members’ names and their activities kept so secret? Why do some gain protection and early warning while the rest of us do not? And what information and “intelligence” is being shared? Since these business members are fully protected by government, how far will they go, and when will it be too late to stop this secret assault by this behemoth we call government?

Gary D. Barnett is president of Barnett Financial Services, Inc., in Lewistown, Montana. Send him email. (gary.barnett@raymondjames.com)











Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...